Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48774/2017bail granted

Lalbahadur Rai @ Lalo Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-11Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48774 of 2017 (2) dt.11-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48774 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2017 Thana -TAJPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Lalbahadur Rai @ Lalo Rai Son of Late Ram Shreshtha Rai Resident of village- Gangapur, P.S.- Tajpur (waini O.P.), District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tajpur (Waini O.P.) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was disposed of with direction to the trial court to expedite the trial and try to conclude the same within a period of three months and petitioner was given liberty that if the trial is not concluded, he may renew his prayer for bail. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that three months period has already expired and he has been in judicial custody for last seven months and petitioner is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48774 of 2017 (2) dt.11-10-2017 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II, Samastipur, in connection with Tajpur (Waini O.P.) P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T