← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60322/2025bail granted

Jung Bahadur Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav @ Jangabahadur Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60322 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Jung Bahadur Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav @ Jangabahadur Yadav S/O Late Dukhi Yadav R/O Village- Navtol Barhi, P.S- Phulparas, Distt.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022 dated 05.06.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, four unknown miscreants ridden on motorcycle came and surrounded the informant and his family members and on the point of pistol they snatched the key of the motorcycle of the informant and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60322 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Tilkeshwar Roy. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.05.2025. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66171 of 2022.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60322 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T