Ankit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65699 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2024 Thana- MEHUSH District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Ankit Kumar Singh Son of Nawal Kishor Sharma @ Nawal Singh Resident of Village - Mapho @ Mafo, Police Station - Mehus, District - Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Sarita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 337, 338 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 6-6-2024, he was returning home after parking his truck and when he reached near the house of Nawal Singh, when petitioner, Pappu and Sonu objected, as to why he is using the route for going home and thereafter the accused assaulted him by iron rod and brick causing injury on forehead. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65699 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/3 informant. It is further submitted that no doubt the injury suffered by the injured is grievous in nature but then from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature, i.e., no specific allegation is alleged against any of the accused persons. It is next submitted that petitioner was not involved in the occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mehus P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7.

However, it is made clear that in the event, if the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65699 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 3/3 Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation or is not presenting himself as and when required, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to forthwith cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons. 8.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned police station through the learned Trial Court. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T