Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56419/2017bail granted

Kuldip Singh @ Sandeep Singh @ Sandeep Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-07Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56419 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Kuldip Singh @ Sandeep Singh @ Sandeep Yadav, son of Kuwar Pal, R/0 village Kadaria, P.S. Kishni, District Mainpuri (U.P.) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. J.K. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 25.01.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Excise Case No. 02 of 2017 having earlier been rejected by order dated 06.04.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 16710 of 2017.

3. It is reiterated that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the recovery of 120 litres of illicit country made liquor from the poultry farm as he had no knowledge of the same. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the period of custody of the above named petitioner since 25.01.2017, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, VII cum Special Judge, Aurangabad, in connection with Excise Case No. 02 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56419 of 2017 (4) dt.07-02-2018 2/2 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U T