Bimal Kant Singh @ Vimal Kant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64859 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2023 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Bimal Kant Singh @ Vimal Kant Singh Son of Umakant Singh Resident of Village - Srirampur Tola, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Happy Kumari Wife of Bimal Kant Singh Resident of Village - Srirampur Tola, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna, at present C/O Alok Kumar Singh (Father), Resident of Village - Gandhar, P.O. - Bandhuganj, P.S. - Ghosi, District - Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhim Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jehanabad Complaint Case No. 283 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 01.10.2024, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator dated 25.11.2024 shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64859 of 2024(4) dt.15-10-2025 2/3 and therefore, the mediation failed.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The allegations are false and concocted. He has submitted further that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2.

6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad Complaint Case No. 283 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

8. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2. The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64859 of 2024(4) dt.15-10-2025 3/3 granted by any other Court of competent jurisdiction granting maintenance to opposite party no. 2. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T