← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/318/2016dismissed

Sursati Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-02-06Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.318 of 2016 ====================================================== Sursati Devi W/o Janki Mahto, Resident of Vill P.S. - Pachrukhi, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

3.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Siwan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Nikesh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sc32-R.K.Priyadarshi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard both sides.

Petitioner filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondent authority to pay compensation of Rs.7,336/- and interest thereon to the petitioner for acquisition of her land for construction of N.H. 85.

A counter affidavit is filed. The respondents made statement in para 6 of the counter affidavit that out of total award amount, Rs.4,277/- has already been paid to the petitioner and rest amount of Rs.2,852/- to Talyab Ali, son of Late Nurul Hoda, who had purchased part of the land.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement made in para 6 of the counter affidavit, this writ petition may be disposed of.

Patna High Court CWJC No.318 of 2016(3) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 Having considered the fact that since the payment has already been made to the petitioner and the purchaser from the petitioner, this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as has become infructuous.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Harish/- U