Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59779 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav S/o Late Kameshwar Yadav R/o Village- Jagdishpur Tola, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 03.04.2025, this petitioner assaulted father of informant while he was stealing his jack fruit and when the informant was bringing his father back, he died on the way.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and petitioner has been made an accused in this case merely on suspicion. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59779 of 2025(3) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2025. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he assaulted father of informant due to which he died. Doctor has found multiple injuries on the body of the deceased.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and materials that have surfaced during course of investigation, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2025, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T