← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19106/2012disposed

Rabindra Nath Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-23Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19106 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Rabindra Nath Tiwary Son Of Late Paras Nath Tiwary Resident Of Village + Post - Chandawa, P.S. - Ara, Nawada, District - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Director General Of Police Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General Of Police Muzaffarpur Range Muzaffarpur

4. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police Champaran Range Betia

5. The Superintendent Of Police East Champaran Motihari

6. The State Of Jharkhand Through The Superintendent Of Police Pakur Jharkhand

7. The Superintendent Of Police Sahebganj Jharkhand

8. The Superintendent Of Police Special Branch Patna (Bihar)

9. The Accountant General Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra For the State of Bihar : Mr. A.Ujjwal, SC 4 Mr. Maruth Nath Roy, AC to SC 4 For the State of Jharkhand : Mr. Sanjiv Jaiswal, Advocate For the A.G., Bihar : Mr. anjani Kr. Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-08-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 5 today, it appears that the petitioner has been paid the amounts of Group Insurance, Gratuity, Earned Leave and General Provident Fund. It has also been stated that pension too has been authorized in favour of the petitioner. The amounts which were payable to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.19106 of 2012 (5) dt.23-08-2016 2/2 petitioner are said to have been credited in his bank account.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that certain amount against difference of salary arising out of revision in pay scale has still remained unpaid.

Considering the above, this application is disposed of with an observation that if the petitioner makes a representation before the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari, as regards payment of difference of salary as claimed, within a period of two weeks from today, the Superintendent of Police will be required to consider his claim and take a final decision within a period of one month from the date of filing of such representation. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T X