Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54403/2017bail granted

Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54403 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54403 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -131 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAUNI RAIL P.S. District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Sanjay Yadav S/o Late Lalo Yadav, R/o Village- Teldi, P.S.- Seikhpura, District- Seikhpura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barauni (Rail) P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 60 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody 25.07.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, period of custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54403 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni (Rail) P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T