Jugeshwar Saw @ Yogeshwar Saw v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66040 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2024 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Jugeshwar Saw @ Yogeshwar Saw Son of Tetar Saw Resident of Village - Nauwakhap, P.S. - Gurua, District- Gaya 2.
Satyendra Kumar Son of Jugeshwar Saw @ Yogeshwar Saw Resident of Village - Nauwakhap, P.S. - Gurua, District- Gaya 3.
Vikash Saw @ Vikash Kumar Son of Basant Saw Resident of Village - Nauwakhap, P.S. - Gurua, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 153(a), 295(a), 353, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners are said to have disturbed the communal harmony and spread caste hysteria by forming illegitimate gatherings.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66040 of 2024(2) dt.03-10-2024 2/2 Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally false and based on concocted facts. They were not present at the place of occurrence, but merely on the basis of their previous criminal antecedents, their names have been transpired in the present case. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. They have one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 123 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T