← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3378/2017allowed

Manauar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-19Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3378 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1036 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Manauar Ansari, Son of Nurul Ansari @ Nurulhak Ansari, Resident of Village- Leruan, P.O.- Kanchanpur, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District- Rohtas. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for regular bail by the learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Registered Case No. 13 of 2017 arising out of Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 1036 of 2016, registered under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act as well as under Section 3(1) (r) (s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

The FIR was lodged with the allegation that the appellant and others induced the minor daughter of the informant to go with them. The victim girl in her statement recorded under

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3378 of 2017 (4) dt.19-01-2018 2/2 Section 164 Cr.P.C. stated that she had voluntarily gone with coaccused Sonu Kumar Choudhary and has already married with him. No one had induced her to go anywhere.

Considering the statement of victim girl, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) khushbu/- U T