Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54159/2017bail granted

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54159 of 2017 (3) dt.23-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54159 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2017 Thana -FATEHPUR District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Sunil Kumar Son of Ambika Pandit Resident of Village- Badalpur, P.S. Narhat, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 318 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that earlier he has taken Rs. 5,000/- from the informant for release of money in Pradhan Mantri Gram Aawas Yojna and further he is also demanding Rs. 15,000, when informant withdrawn second installment of Rs. 45,000/-.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and his restatement itself is contradictory to the written report filed by him. Moreover, he has been in custody for two months and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54159 of 2017 (3) dt.23-11-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-X, Gaya, in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 318 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce or make any threat to the informant.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T