Ramesh Mehta @ Ramesh Kumar Raman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72202 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1153 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Ramesh Mehta @ Ramesh Kumar Raman son of Jagdish Mehta Vill- Birraily, Ward no.5, P.S- Bharrahi, Dist- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Binita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354(B), 384, 385, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that on 02.11.2023, she along with her son were in their field, when Ramesh along with Ravi came and threatened with a country-made pistol, asking them to vacate the land or in lieu thereof to pay extortion of Rs.5 lacs, on objection by her son, the accused fired but then the shot misfired, thereafter Ravi assaulted her son by an iron rod causing injury above his eye.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72202 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 02.11.2023 and the FIR was instituted on 21.11.2023 i.e. after a delay of 20 days, which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi) P.S. Case No.1153/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T