Minu Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.418 of 2019 ====================================================== Minu Devi, wife of Ranjeet Kumar Singh, resident of Village-Rasalpur,P.S. Moffasil,Distt.-Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary,Panchayati Raj Department,Govt. of Bihr,Patna 3.

The Director,Panchayati Raj Department,Government of Bihar,Patna 4.

The District Magistrate,Gaya 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer,Gaya jSadar,Distt.-Gaya 6.

The Block Development Officer,Manpur-cum-Executive Officer,Block Panchayat Samiti,Manpur,Distt.-Gay 7.

The Secretary,State Election Commission,Bihar at Patna 8.

Anju Kumari Wife of Anil rajak 9.

Komal Anita Singh Wife of Amit Kumar Singh 10.

Ashutosh Kumar Son of Ramanugrah Singh 11.

Umesh Manjhi Son of Late Gobind Manjhi 12.

Sita Devi Wife of Ashok Mistri 13.

Rina Devi Wife of Ashok Thakur 14.

Saraswati Devi wife of Ajay Kumar das 15.

Rajendra Chaudhary Son of Chandar Choudhary 16.

Rmsha Jaween Wife of Md. Sharim Ali 17.

Anwari Khatoon wife of Md. Alamgir 18.

Nusrat Khatoon wife of Md. Gamib 19.

Jitendra Kumar Singh Son of Chamroo Singh 20.

Sushma Kumari, Wife of Munib Yadav null 21.

Sharda Devi Wife of Akhilesh Choudhary null 22.

Akhtar Hussain Son of Md. Islam null 23.

Rita Devi Wife of Chandrika Paswan Respondent Nos.8 to 23 are the Members of Block Panchayat Samiti,Manpur through the Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer,Block Panchayat Sammiti,Manpur,P.S. Muffasil,Dist.-Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh- Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Alok- SC-7 For Election Commission:

Mr. Girish Pandey- Advocate

Patna High Court CWJC No.418 of 2019(3) dt.12-05-2023 2/2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the State Election Commission.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the writ application has become infructuous and thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U