Patna High CourtCR. WJC/43/2016disposed

Fuleshwari Devi @ Phuleshari Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And O

2016-05-04Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.43 of 2016 ====================================================== Fuleshwari Devi @ Phuleshari Devi, Wife of Late Domi Ram, Resident of village - Rampur Itahara, P.S. Saur Bazar, ( Baijnathpur O.P. ), District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

4. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Koshi Range, Saharsa

6. The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa

7. The Station House officer - Cum - Officer - in - CHarge, Bihar, P.S., District - Saharsa

8. The Investigating Officer of Bihra, P.S. Case No. 6/2012, P.S. Bihra, District - Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siyaram Pandey Mr. A K Arun For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nasim Yahya, GP 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 The petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to properly investigate the murder case of the husband of the petitioner lodged vide Bihar P S Case No. 06/2012 registered under Sections 302/201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the State submits that on completion of the investigation, report has been filed under Section 173, Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate and that further steps for prosecution of the case shall be taken in accordance with law.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.43 of 2016 (7) dt.04-05-2016 2/2 The grievance of the petitioner is that though the report has been filed but the remaining accused have not been arrested even though an application for Anticipatory Bail has been rejected on 2nd May, 2016.

Once the report has been filed, I do not find any further directions are necessary inasmuch as per the respondents, the accused have been shown as absconders. As and when they are brought to book, further proceedings shall be taken in accordance with law. No further directions are called for in the present application.

This application stands disposed of.

(Hemant Gupta, J) mrl U T