Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54775/2017bail granted

Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54775 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54775 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2017 Thana -BOCHHA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ajeet Kumar son of Shri Jagdish Singh, resident of Village- Madarna, P.S. Vaishali, District Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 175 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegation is of recovery of one live cartridge and two mobiles from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 28.08.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54775 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017 ACJM- Cum - Sub Judge XI, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 175 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T