Rajendra Chaudhary And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No 30710 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3060 Year- 2011 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ===========================================================
1. Rajendra Chaudhary Son of Late Darvehwar Chaudhary
2. Munni Devi Wife of Rajendra Chaudhary
3. Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Chaudhary, Son of Rajendra Choudhary All are residents of Village - Bhorakhara, P.S. Patepur, Dist.-Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State of Bihar
2. Shusmita Kumari @ Renu Devi Wife of Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Chaudhary, Daughter of Bankey Chaudhary, Resident of Village - Shambhu Nath Pur Dholi,, P.S.-Sakra, Dist.-Muzaffarpur .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : M/s Pramod Kr Verma & Rajeev Ranjan Sinha, Advocates For Opposite Party No 2 : Ms Anita Kumari Singh, Kr Samarjeet Singh, Advocates For the S t a t e : Mr Gajendra Pd Yadav, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-10-2017 Both parties are present.
2 On 19.07.2017, on a common prayer made by the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre. On that occasion, petitioner No 3, husband of the complainant, had drawn the Court's attention to the statement made in the petition that he is willing to keep the complainant with him as his wife. The report dated 18.09.2017 from the Mediation Centre has been received. From the same, it appears that after having obtained stay in the instant case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30710 of 2014 dt.04-10-2017 2/2 the petitioners chose not to appear before the Mediation Centre. 3 The instant case is one under Section 498A of Indian Penal code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 4 In view of the conduct of the petitioners, as noticed aforesaid, it would not be, in the interest of justice, to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code in favour of the petitioners.
5 The application is dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.10.2017 Transmission Date 07.10.2017