Ramchandra Ram Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68638 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2019 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda ====================================================== RAMCHANDRA RAM SAHU SON OF MADHO SAHU RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SHIVMANDIR, KADI TAND, P.S. - RATU, DISTRICT - RANCHI (JHARKHAND), PIN - 835222 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP.

Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, petitioner is said to have taken a huge amount i.e. 15,00,000/- from the complainant with a false promise to return the said amount within eighteen months, but he did not return. After several requests, petitioner issued cheque of 15,00,000/- to the complainant, but the same was bounced due to insufficient money.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68638 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 2/3 offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. Petitioner has no concern with the complainant. The real fact is that the petitioner gave two cheques to his close friend Ashu Uraw for help in his business. The cheque was blank and no name was written in those cheques. Ashu Uraw cheated the petitioner and gave cheque to the complainant. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is money transaction related dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 465C of 2019,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68638 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 3/3 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T