← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60067/2025bail granted

Surya Mohan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60067 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna ====================================================== Surya Mohan Yadav S/o Satya Narayan Yadav R/o Vil- Mubarakpur, P.O.- Enai, P.S.- Revilganj, District- Saran (Chapra) presently residing at Ward No. 14, Mohalla- Baradari Ratanpura, Kot Devi Mandir, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, Distt- Chapra (Saran) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

The Director, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Bihar, Patna Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Devashish Giri Mr. Kushal Mr. Sumit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar For the Vigilance Dept. :

Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025/ Special Case No. 25 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner has been trapped while accepting bribe.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2025 and he has been removed/dismissed from service.

5. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60067 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that that the petitioner has been sufficiently punished for the offence alleged to have been committed by him.

6. Learned counsel for the Vigilance Department has opposed the application of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner has been caught red handed accepting bribe and therefore he should not be released on bail.

7. I have heard and considered the submission of the parties.

8. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2025 and the fact that he has already been removed from service, this application is allowed.

9. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur/concerned Court below in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025 / Special Case No. 25 of 2025.

10. As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after being released on bail is directed to co-operate in the trial either

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60067 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 3/3 by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Non-compliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U