Vimal Shah @ Vimal Sah @ Bima Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71785 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2016 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna ====================================================== Vimal Shah @ Vimal Sah @ Bima Saw Son of Devendra Sah @ Devendra Saw @ Devendra Shah Resident of Chakeyaj Mahanar, P.S.- Desari, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-10-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Special Case No.- 27 of 2016, arising out of Malsalami P.S. Case No. 158 of 2016 lodged under Sections 20/ 22/ 25/ 25(A) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected 4 times, it is 5th time, he moves before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the recovery of N.D.P.S. material from the possession of the petitioner is about 208 kg of ganja.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71785 of 2021(4) dt.13-10-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that it has been rejected 4 times earlier and trial is likelihood to complete. Report has been called for this case in which it has been stated by the Court that case may be disposed of within 2 months. This report has been provided in this case on 20.06.2022 and 2 months has also lapsed.

Considering the fact that the commercial quantity of N.D.P.S. material is recovered from the possession of petitioner and it has been rejected 4 times earlier.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but liberty is hereby granted to renew his prayer for bail 6 months from today.

With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U T