← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63857/2023bail granted

Hajari Yadav @ Hajari Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-22Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63857 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2023 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== HAJARI YADAV @ HAJARI KUMAR YADAV Son Of Satyanarayan Yadav @ Satyanarayan Singh Resident Of Village- Mohammadpur, P.S.- Shiv Sagar, Distt- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kuber Pathak, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 121 of 2023, dated 11.04.2023 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 414, 419, 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. This is second attempt of the petitioner for the relief of regular bail after his earlier prayer was rejected by this Bench vide order dated 25.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44257 of 2023 preferred by this petitioner.

4. The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that the petitioner earlier preferred Cr. Misc. No. 44257 of 2023 for the relief of regular bail which was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63857 of 2023(2) dt.22-09-2023 2/2 rejected by this Bench, giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his bail prayer after framing of charge and in view of the said liberty petitioner has come again before this Court for the same relief as upon him charges have been framed on 25.08.2023. Further submissions are that petitioner has been languishing in jail since 14.04.2023 having fair and clean antecedent, his case is at initial stage and he is a very young person.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above submissions and mainly the petitioner's custody period and stage of his case, in my opinion, petitioner now deserves to the privilege of bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 121 of 2023. (Shailendra Singh, J.) Maynaz/- U T