Bhikhari Chaudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60524 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2025 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bhikhari Chaudhari S/o Late Jaga Chaudhari R/o Village - Jungle Mahal, P.S.- Kargahar, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ravi Shankar Singh , Advocate For the State :

Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 352, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, along with co-accused Nirmal Chaudhary, assaulted on the head of informant with iron rod.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60524 of 2025(2) dt.08-09-2025 2/2

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with co-accused Nirmal Chaudhary, assaulted on the head of informant with iron rod. Doctor has opined the injuries, sustained by the injured, as grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T