Shri Ram Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3906 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2014 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== SHRI RAM SAHNI Son of Suraj Sahani Resident of Village- Malah Chak, P.S.- Salempur, District- Deoria (U.P.) ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 13.08.2019 in Guthani P.S.Case No.241 of 2014 passed by the learned Special Judge, Siwan, registered under Sections 302,120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(vi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
The assailants of the deceased are named in the FIR. Allegation against the appellant is that he was also helper of the real culprits.
Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3906 of 2019(4) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 Considering the nature of material against the appellant and completion of investigation, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T