Patna High CourtCWJC/13694/2014disposed

Ram Babu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13694 of 2014 =========================================================== Ram Babu Yadav, Son of Sri Baldeo Yadav, resident of Village+ Post::- Rampati, Tole Sri Ganj, Circle+ P.S.- Rajnagar, District:- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Land Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector, Madhubani.

4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar Madhubani, District:- Madhubani.

5. The Circle Officer, Rajnagar, District:- Madhubani.

6. The Anchal Amin, Rajnagar, District:- Madhubani. ... Respondent 1st Set.

7. Kusum Gope, Son of Faujdar Gope

8. Lailuku Yadav, Son of Prem Gope Both are resident of Village:- Rampatti, Tole Sri Granj, P.S.:- Rajnagar, District:- Madhubani.

.... .... Respondent 2nd Set =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshari, A.A.G. XI For the Respondent no.7 : Mr. Ratna Kumar Jha, Adocate Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 23-03-2015 The petitioner approached this Court by way of this public interest litigation alleging that though respondents 7 and 8 have encroached the public Rasta, the State authorities and the Revenue Department did not take any step.

On behalf of the respondents 4 and 5, a counter affidavit is filed admitting that not only the respondents 7 and 8, but

Patna High Court CWJC No.13694 of 2014 dt.23-03-2015 2/2 the petitioner have also encroached the public Rasta. A supplementary affidavit is also filed on 17.03.2015 stating that all the encroachments, including those made by the respondents 7 and 8 and the petitioner have been removed. The report in relation thereto is filed as Annexure-I.

In view of the aforesaid facts, we close the writ petition.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

(L. Narasimha Reddy, CJ) (Vikash Jain, J) Sunil/- U