Ranjit Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4676 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -211 Year- 2016 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ranjit Yadav, Son of Shival Yadav.

2. Shival Yadav, son of Kailash Yadav.

3. Darogi Yadav, son of Kailash Yadav.

4. Pappu Yadav, son of Darogi Yadav. All are Resident of VillageGuriyawan, Police Station- Mohanpur, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 211 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 379, 307, 354(A), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the petitioners caught the hand of the informant when she was cleaning the cow dung and directed to leave that place and when she protested they started opening the sari of the informant, resulting, she raised alarm and when her husband was coming they assaulted with knife on her chick and further snatched gold ear ring and they assaulted her husband and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4676 of 2017 (2) dt.20-02-2017 2/2 snatched Rs. 500/-.

Submission is of false implication and that injury received by the informant is simple in nature, due to land dispute the petitioners have been implicated. The allegations are omnibus and general in nature. It is not believable that father and son will jointly tried to open the sari and rest allegations are ornamental and, as such, the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 211 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T