Shashi Kant Kumar v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16269 of 2022 ====================================================== Shashi Kant Kumar Son of Jay Jay Ram Pandit At Mohalla- Ward no.- 12 Near Kali Mandir Baghra Purani Madhepura, P.S.- Puraini Bazar, DistrictMadhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Finance and Company Act, New Delhi.
2.
The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Department of Transport Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Chief Manager, Reserve Bank of India at South Gandhi Maidan, Patna4. 4.
District Magistrate, Purnia.
5.
Branch Manager, Tata Motor Finance Solutions Limited at 1st Floor Manju Complex Bhata Bazar Purnia- 854301.
6.
Purnia Branch, Purnia.
7.
S. Kumar, Proprietor, Kumar Repho Repossessing agent care of Branch Manager Tata Motor Finance Purnia Branch, Purnia. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Indira Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Additional Solicitor General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 25-11-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "That this is an application for direction to the Respondents Authorities No.2 to 4 to get release the illegally seized vehicle of petitioner as well as the respondent no- No.5 the Branch Manager Tata Motor Finance Purnia Branch Purnia at Purnia to release the Truck No. BR-10GB-9525 of this petitioner
Patna High Court CWJC No.16269 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 2/2 seized forcefully and illegally by their goons on 16.12.2021 through Respondent-6 alleging that some installments amount was due against the said vehicle, which is in dispute."
After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars, on the same and subsequent cause of action, if so required and desired.
Permission granted with liberty, as prayed for. As and when any such petition is filed, the same shall be listed on priority basis.
Instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) chn/sujit U