Patna High CourtCR. MISC./908/2017dismissed

Asha Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-01-17Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.908 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2003 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Asha Devi, Wife of Late Satya Narain Sinha, Resident of Village-Sarari, PO + PS-Shahpur, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Rit Lal Yadav, son of Ramashish Rai, Resident of Village Kothwan, PS+PO Khagaul, District-Patna

3. Sunil Yadav alias Kana son of Yugal Rai, Resident of Village Bari Badalpur, PS+PO Khagaul, District-Patna

4. Ranjan Kumar Yadav alias Benga Yadav son of Ram Sakal Rai, Resident of Mohalla New Sabajpur PO + PS Khagaul, District-Patna

5. Sharwan Rai alias Sharwan Kumar Rai son of Suresh Rai, Resident of Village-Kothwan, PO + PS Khagaul, District-Patna.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The present application for transfer of Sessions Trial No. 246 of 2006 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No. 200 of 2003 has been filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code).

3. With similar prayer, the petitioner had earlier approached this Court for transfer, which had given rise to Cr. Misc. No. 18493 of 2016, and came to be disposed of by an order, dated 13.05.2016. The petitioner's prayer for transfer of the case was not entertained. While disposing of the said application, this

Court, by the order, dated 13.05.2016 had directed the Court below to conclude the trials of the cases within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the said order.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the trials have so far not been concluded.

5. I do not find any merit in this application, which is, accordingly, dismissed.

6. It is, however, observed that the trial Court must proceed for expeditious disposal of the trials. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U