← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13848/2023disposed

Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-02Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13848 of 2023 ====================================================== Rinku Devi W/o Himanshu Kumar, Resident of Village- Ramnagar, Post - Chhatauna, P.S. - Nokha, Dist. - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department.

2.

Deputy Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Joint Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

6.

District Magistrate, Dist.- Rohtas.

7.

District Panchayati Raj Officer, Dist. - Rohtas. 8.

Executive Officer, Panchayati Raj Department, Nokha, Dist - Rohtas. 9.

The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Nokha, Dist - Rohtas. 10.

Amar Paswan, Ex-BPRO, Block- Nokha, Dist - Rohtas. 11.

The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayat Chhatauna, Block- Nokha, Dist - Rohtas.

12.

The Junior Engineer, Panchayati Raj Chhtauna, Block - Nokha, Dist - Rohtas.

13.

Tripti Kumari, W/o - Arvind Kumar, resident of - Chhatauna, Post - Chhatauna, P.S. - Nokha, Dist- Rohtas. The present Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat Raj, Chhatauna, Block - Nokha, Dist - Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Shankar Choubey, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kumar Alok, SC-7.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-01-2024 Heard Mr. Bijay Shankar Choubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Alok, learned SC-7 for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs this Court that in spite of the fact that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.13848 of 2023 dt.02-01-2024 2/2 petitioner has filed a detailed representation before the District Magistrate, Rohtas in light of the specific direction given by the Deputy Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department as contained in Memo No. 9999 dated 19.10.2022, the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed.

3. Considering the aforesaid information given on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate cum Collector, Rohtas to look into the affairs of the Chhatauna Panchayat, District - Rohtas and take appropriate action on the basis of the audit for the concerned financial year and the report submitted by the three men committee as contained in Annexure-5.

4. The above action must be taken by the District Magistrate cum Collector well within a period of six weeks and information to the above extent must be provided to the petitioner.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 02.01.2024 Transmission Date N.A.