Patna High CourtCWJC/17102/2014disposed

Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17102 of 2014 =========================================================== Sudhir Kumar, son of Late Chandrika Prasad, resident of village -Tilaiya, Post Office - Patharaura, Police Station - Chhabilapur, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif

2. The Commissioner - Cum - Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif

4. The District Compassionate Selection Committee through its Chairman, the District Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda at Biharsharif

6. The Area Education and Extension Officer, Hilsa

7. The Block Education and Extension Officer, Hilsa, Nalanda at Biharsharif

8. The Secretary, Personal and Administrative Reforms, Govt. of Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravi Verma, AC to GP-8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-09-2018 The issue raised in the present writ application is no more res integra.

In the matter of compassionate appointment, the issue was finally decided by the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh & Ano. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., reported in (2017) 5 SCC 383. In view of the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh & Ano. (supra), the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to take appropriate decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of

Patna High Court CWJC No.17102 of 2014 dt.26-09-2018 2/2 this order and grant all consequential benefits, if the petitioner is entitled to such benefit in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Mukesh & Ano. (supra).

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 27.09.2018 Transmission Date