Md. Tarique Azim And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41093 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -861 Year- 2014 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Md. Tarique Azim son of late Azimuddin

2. Md. Aftab Azim @ Pappu son of late Azimuddin Both residents of Moharram Manzil Chitragupta Nagar, Araria, Ward No. 21, Police Station Araria, District Araria

3. Md. Tabrez son of Moharram Ali resident of village Mahsaili, P.S. Bounsi, at present Moharram Manzil Araria, Ward No. 21, Police StationAraria, District Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341,323,353,504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the nature of allegations and fair antecedents of the petitioners, in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Complaint Case No. C 861 of 2014, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria subject to the conditions as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41093 of 2014 (3) dt.20-03-2015 2/2 laid down under sections 438(2) Cr. P. C. and (i) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) that the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse,(iv) that the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) that the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.