Pushpa Clement v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17281 of 2023 ====================================================== Pushpa Clement D/o Clement Paul, W/o Anthony Cherobin Francis, Resident of Mohalla- Christian Quarter Church Road, Bettiah P.S.- Bettiah, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah. 4.
The Chairman, Zila Parishad, Bettiah, West Champaran. 5.
The District Development Commissioner -cum- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, West Champaran, Bettiah.
6.
The District Education Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah. 7.
The District Programme Officer, (Secondary Education), West Champaran, Bettiah.
8.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), West Champaran, Bettiah. 9.
The Principal, Rajkiyakrit Champa Kunwar (10 Plus 2) High School, BlockLauriya, West Champaran. 10.
The Principal, Adarsh Project Girls Upgraded High School (10 Plus 2) Macchargawa, Block- Yogapatti, West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saurav Singh, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, G.P.-23 Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to G.P.-23 For the Zila Parishad :
Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for the respondents.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application and seeks liberty to file a fresh writ application to challenge the order dated
Patna High Court CWJC No.17281 of 2023(3) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 20.11.2024 submitting that all the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, only payment was not made as yet.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U