← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60552/2022allowed

Savita Devi @ Sabita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-23Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60552 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2021 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SAVITA DEVI @ SABITA DEVI W/o Late Dashrath Chaudhary R/o Darihara, P.S.- Dariyapur, Distt- Saran.

2.

Pintu Chaudhary @ Mangaru S/o Late Dashrath Chaudhary R/o Darihara, P.S.- Dariyapur, Distt- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kr Singh No.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons had assaulted the committed the murder of the daughter of the informant and disposed of her dead body.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner no.1 is mother in law

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60552 of 2022(2) dt.23-02-2023 2/2 of the deceased and petitioner no.2 is brother-in-law of the deceased. He submits that husband of the deceased has already been acquitted by the learned Court below vide Session Trial No. 172/2022. He further submits that there is nothing specific allegation has been made against the petitioners and they have nothing to do with day to day personal life of the husband and wife. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No.97/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T