Ram Bachan Sah v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14425 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Bachan Sah Son of Ramgati Sah, Resident of village- Didikhili, P.S. Durgawati, District- Kaimur Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India New Delhi.

3.

The National Highway Authority of India through its Chairman-cumSecretary Ministry of Shipping Road Transport and Highway, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

4.

The Project Director, National Highway Authority, D.I.G. Colony Maqbul Alam Road, Varanasi, U.P.

5.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate Kaimur at Bhabhua 6.

The District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Kaimur Bhabhua.

7.

The Additional Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Bhabhua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, GP-6.

For the UOI :

Ms. Kanak Verma, CGC.

For the NHAI :

Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Advocate.

:

Ms. Preety Ranjan, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-12-2024 No one is present on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned counsel for the Union of India, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the National Highway Authority of India are present.

2. From the ordersheet, it appears that on previous occasions also i.e. on 21.10.2024, 18.11.2024 & 25.11.2024, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner and in the interest of

Patna High Court CWJC No.14425 of 2015(5) dt.09-12-2024 2/2 justice this matter was re-notified today, however, today also no one is present on behalf of the petitioner.

3. The matter is pending since 2015.

4. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue this case, accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands dismissed due to non-prosecution.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U