Manish Kumar Keshri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77043 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2013 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Manish Kumar Keshri, S/o Rajendra Prasad Keshri @ Rajendra Pd. Shah Resident of Village Nachap, P.S. Murar, District Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 221 of 2013 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Informant who is the father of the deceased has alleged that Mukesh Kumar Singh along with other co-accused has killed his son.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in FIR. There is no eye witness of the occurrence. FIR named accused Mukesh Kumar Singh has been granted bail vide order dated 26.09.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22269 of 2014. He is in custody since 05.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77043 of 2018(2) dt.20-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 221 of 2013 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/manojU T