← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73850/2019dismissed

Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-22Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73850 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2017 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== ARVIND KUMAR Son of Sri Kamleshwar Singh Resident of VillageRahimapur, Police Station- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Birendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Ganesh Singh Resident of VillageBhagwanpur, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali. 3.

Shambhu Kumar Singh @ Shambhu Nath Singh Son of Late Ganesh Singh Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party nos. 2 and 3 vide order dated 13.11.2017 passed in A.B.P. NO. 1622/2017 arising out of Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 152 of 2017 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504, 506 and 120(B) of I.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that court below has failed to consider the fact that the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 have not transferred the remaining 55 decimals. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73850 of 2019(4) dt.22-07-2026 2/2 have not completed the sale or refunded the money and they allegedly have threatened the petitioner with dire consequences.

4. From perusal of the records, it appears that the dispute is with regard to the transfer of land arising out of oral agreement for sale.

5. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined for interference with the impugned order passed by the court below.

6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T