Mahendra Prasad And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.607 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Mahendra Prasad and Anr Son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad Resident of Village - Bahadurpur, P.S. Goraul, District - Vaishali A P.D.S. Dealer of Katarmala and Sandho Panchayat, Prakhand Goraul, District - Vaishali. 2.

Umesh Prasad Singh Son of Late Vikrama Singh Resident of Village - Chakbyash, P.S. - Goraul, District - Vaishali An Ex - P.D.S. Dealer of Katarmala Panchayat, Prakhand Goraul, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Food, Supply and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur. 4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Vaishali at Hajipur. 5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Goraul, District - Vaishali. 7.

The Block Supply Officer, Goraul, District - Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Namrata Mishra-GA-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 18-11-2024

1. The Writ petition is filed to quash the order Memo No. 1130 dated 08.09.2016 issued by the Block Development Officer, Goraul, Vaishali whereby the petitioners were directed to deposit the remaining amount mentioned in column No. 10 of the said order, in Block Nazarat till 20.09.2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.607 of 2017(5) dt.18-11-2024 2/2

2. It is reported to the Court that petitioner has not deposited the remaining amount before the respondent and subsequent to that date ie. 20.09.2016, no order was passed by the respondent.

3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that it is a conditional order directing the petitioners to deposit the amount till 20.09.2016 and subsequently, there are no arrears, therefore, nothing remains in the Writ petition for adjudication.

4. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for the petitioner intends to withdraw the Writ petition with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the respondent, if any.

5. Permission is accorded. The Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) vinita/- U