Anil Yadav @ Chhota Sandeep @ Sandeep v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59710 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2020 Thana- DHANGAI District- Gaya ====================================================== ANIL YADAV @ CHHOTA SANDEEP @ SANDEEP Son of Late Janeshwar Yadav @ Awadhesh Yadav R/v- Simrahua, P.S.- Bandeya, DistrictAurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 120(B), 121, 121(A), 122, 124(A), 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 13, 16, 18 and 20 of unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, on getting secret information about gathering of miscreants making plan to attack on police picket and security force, police party proceeded there and apprehended 8-10 suspected persons. Accused persons started cross firing upon the police force. On search, several arms were recovered from them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59710 of 2022(3) dt.20-02-2023 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is named in the FIR due to high handedness of police. No witness has supported the prosecution case. There is no consistent evidence against the petitioner to implicate him in the present case. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.05.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Gaya in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No. 15 of 2020. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U