Ayub Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4199 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2016 Thana -NIMCHAKBATHANI District- GAYA ====================================================== Ayub Khan, Son of Late Hafiz Khan, resident of Village- Telari, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 20-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 65 of 2016 registered under Sections- 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity and merely on suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named accused in the first information report. During investigation, witnesses have named this petitioner. Post mortem report shows that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4199 of 2017 (4) dt.20-03-2017 2/2 deceased sustained injuries.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner coupled with the submissions made on behalf of the State, I do not feel inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for anticipatory bail is, therefore, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Manish/- U T