Madan Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.109 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Madan Kumar and Ors Son of Late Ramcharitra Prasad Resident of Village - Dhatta, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 2.
Devnarayan Sah Son of Shyamlal Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 3.
Jagdish Sah Son of Sahdeo Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 4.
Shankar Kumar Gupta Son of Chandeshwar Prasad Gupta Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani.
5.
Lakshami Sah Son of Kankaur Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 6.
Nand Kumar Prasad Son of Kankaur Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 7.
Shiv Narayan Sah Son of Ramadhin Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 8.
Sanjay Kumar Son of Ram Kumar Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 9.
Kishori Prasad Sah Son of Khatar Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 10.
Chandeshwar Sah Son of Saryug Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 11.
Devi Lal Sah Son of Nandalal Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 12.
Binod Sah Son of Moti Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 13.
Lakshman Gupta Son of Raj Narayan Prasad Gupta Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 14.
Shiv Narayan Sah Son of Kanko Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 15.
Hari Narayan Sah Son of Shyam Lal Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 16.
Raj Kumar Sah Son of Shyam Sundar Sah Resident of Village - Laukaha, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. 17.
Dhanma Devi Wife of Late Hari Narayan Prasad Gupta Resident of Village - Dattatol, P.O. - Laukaha, Police Station - Laukaha, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.
District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Competent Authority, Madhubani. 3.
The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Phulparas, Madhubani.
Patna High Court CWJC No.109 of 2017(3) dt.30-08-2025 2/3 4.
The Circle Officer, Khutauna, Madhubani.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-08-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though Mr. Dhurjati Kumar, learned G.P. 14 is present.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
for issuance of appropriate writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions commanding the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioners as per New Bihar State Settlement and Rehabilitation Policy 2007 in view of the acquisition of land of the petitioners, which has been acquired for construction of road under the scheme of " Mukhya MantriGramin SadakYojna'and/or for other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled in course of hearing of this writ application.
3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent nos. 1 and 3 duly signed by the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Phulparas, Madhubani according to which, no construction has been made on the land in question and
Patna High Court CWJC No.109 of 2017(3) dt.30-08-2025 3/3 further, the Circle Officer, Khutauna was also requested to measure/demarcate the road.
4. Learned State Counsel has taken this Court to the different Annexures of the writ petition to show that the petitioners volunteered themselves the land for better movement.
5. In this case, counter affidavit was filed in the year 2018 after service of copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner and thereafter, the order sheet shows that twice the adjournments were taken and today there is no appearance.
6. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U