← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4869/2017bail granted

Mallu Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4869 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2016 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Mallu Kumar, son of Late Munshi Kumar

2. Chameli Devi, wife of Mallu Kumar, Both Residents of VillageSindigate, Buxar, P.S.- Buxar, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Babulal Prasad, son of Late Kali Charan Prasad,

3. Chanda Devi, wife of Jitendra Kumar @ Loha Kumar, D/o Babulal Prasad, Both Resident of Village- Bikramganj, Ward No. 19, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. V.D. Singh, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant. The case is under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4869 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and they are father-in-law and mother-in-law, let above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twentyfive thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas, in connection with Complaint Case no. 47 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. There are other conditions also that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available before the police as and when required.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T