Aaditya Tato v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62581 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2025 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Aaditya Tato Son of Ramji Tato Resident of Village - Praygpur, P.S. - Shivsagar, Dist. - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 1190, 126 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109, 352 and 351 (2) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner allegedly gave 'Bhala' blow to one Sunil Pandey.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that there is also a counter version relating to the same occurrence. It is further contended that the fact is that at the place of occurrence harvester is there and as the victim, Sunil Pandey had fallen on that harvester, he sustained injury. It is also contended that it is a case of free fight between the parties in which both sides received injuries. Moreover, the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62581 of 2025(3) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 languishing in judicial custody since 12.07.2025 having no criminal antecedent.
5. From a perusal of the injury report, it is clear that victim, Sunil Pandey, sustained two injuries: firstly wound of about 2"x 2"x 1⁄2 " on left lateral chest region and secondly, pain in the chest. The doctor has opined that the injuries are grievous in nature caused by sharp and hard object.
6. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation is of only giving one blow. There is no repetition and as such it shows the intention of the petitioner.
7. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram at Rohtas. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T