Ishtdeo Mahadeo v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.52 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2014 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna ====================================================== Ishtdeo Mahadeo S/o late Deo Narayan Paswan, Resident of Village- Ekdara, P.O.- Boriya, P.S. Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur, presently posted as Sr. Dy. Collector, Rohtas, District- Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Director General Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Superintendent of Police-cum-Officer in-charge, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Regional Office, Muzaffarpur.
6. The Investigation Officer, Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Regional Office, Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate : Mr.Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate : Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Ajay Kumar, AC to GP-4 For the Vigilance : Mr. Ajay Mishra, AC to Law Officer I/C Vigilance ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-01-2019 At the outset, it is pointed out by Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, that though the instant writ petition has been filed for quashing the FIR of Vigilance P.S. Case No.019 of 2014 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, during pendency of the writ petition investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. He submitted that the writ petition may be disposed
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.52 of 2017(8) dt.10-01-2019 2/2 of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order taking cognizance by way of filing another appropriate application in accordance with law.
Leave is granted.
The writ petition is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md. S/- U T