← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9771/2017rejected

Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-26Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9771 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2016 Thana -PURANHIA District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar, Son of Vinod Rai, resident of Village- Basant Jagjeevan, P.S.- Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. Allegation against the petitioner is that he attempted to commit rape by entering into the house of the informant.

Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner, in my view, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Purnahiya P.S. Case No.64 of 2016 pending in the court of learned Additional District

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9771 of 2017 (3) dt.26-04-2017 & Sessions Judge-1st -cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Sheohar is refused.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Arvind/- U T