Mithun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64825 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- Madhepura ====================================================== Mithun Kumar Son of Suraj Mukhiya Village- Lalpur W.No-1, Tola Beharba Ps- Singheshwar Dist- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Mala Kumari D/o- Subhash Mukhiya, W/o- Mithun Kumar village- Manpur Tola Godhiyari Ps- Singheshwar Dist- Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Madhepura Complaint Case No. 04 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 498(A)/341/323 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties have submitted that now they are ready to settle the dispute.

4. Without going into the merits of the matter, petitioner is granted provisional anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the event or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64825 of 2024(4) dt.12-05-2025 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist Class, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura Complaint Case No. 04 of 2024.

5. The concerned Court is directed to make suitable efforts for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.

6. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

7. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional anticipatory bail.

8. If, on the other hand, the issue is not resolved between the parties, the learned trial court, needless to say, would be well within its jurisdiction to exercise its judicial discretion and pass appropriate orders, which may include cancellation of the petitioner's provisional bail.

9. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/- U T