M/S Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14037 of 2024 ====================================================== M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited, a private limited company having its office at near State Bank of India, C/o- Muneshwar Prasad, Nai Sarai, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda- 803101, Bihar through its Director Kumar Mritunjay, (Male, aged about 56 Years), son of Late Tejnarayan Singh, Resident of Village- Moratalab, P.S.- Rahui, Moratalab, District- Nalanda, Bihar-803118.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Finance, North Block, New Delhi110001. 2.

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India having its office at North Block, New Delhi-110001. 3.

State of Bihar through Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

4.

Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Biharsharif, Patna East, Patna, Bihar. 5.

Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Biharsharif, Patna East, Patna, Bihar ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. D.V. Pathy, Senior Advocate For the UoI :

Mr. Anshuman Singh, Senior SC For the State :

Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 29-01-2025 At the outset, Mr. D.V. Pathy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits on instruction that he would withdraw this writ application in order to avail the alternative remedy of settlement before competent authority.

2. Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned AC to GP-7 for the State are present and have no objection to

Patna High Court CWJC No.14037 of 2024(7) dt.29-01-2025 2/2 the same.

3. Permission is granted.

4. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek any alternative remedy which may be available to it in accordance with law. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) lekhi/- U