Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64304/2024dismissed

Sonadhari Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-26Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64304 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sonadhari Ram Son of Late Dashrath Ram Village- Lilori, ps- Charpokhari, dist- Bhojpur at Ara ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the grandson of the informant's namely Raja Kumar was missing. On being inquired, the informant came to know that his grandson has gone with this petitioner. The petitioner told him that he has given his mobile to the grandson of the informant while he has gone to ease himself. During investigation, this petitioner has given his confessional statement and stated that he has thrown the deceased in a well and the dead body was recovered from the well. It is clear from para-16 of the case diary. The petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64304 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 2/2 was last seen with the deceased and dead body has been recovered on his identification.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 18.02.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, the present regular bail application stands dismissed.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T