Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7224/2015bail granted

Pramod Sao And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-18Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7224 of 2015 (2) dt.18-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7224 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2013 Thana -FESHAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Pramod Sao S/o Dhaneshwar Sao

2. Dhaneshwar Sao S/o Late Mungeshwar Sao Both are Resident of Village Raghulia, P.S. Fesar, District Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Nath Mishra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioners have renewed their prayer for bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 11.7.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16146 of 2014 on the ground that liberty was granted to the petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after examination of the informant and now the informant has been examined before the trial court who has not supported the prosecution case, and as such, the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration to which the learned APP fairly submits that the informant has not supported the prosecution case. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7224 of 2015 (2) dt.18-03-2015 petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judege II, Aurangabad in Sessions Tr. No. 275 of 2014 / 212 of 2014 arising out of Fesar P.S. Case No. 9 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T