Satya Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.827 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2004 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Satya Narayan Yadav s/o Late Bhuvneshwari Yadav Resident of VillageNavtoliya, P.S Shankarpur, District-Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dinesh Prasad Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 10/2004, instituted for offence under Section(s) 396 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2018. The other accused persons have faced trial and they have been acquitted. Name of this petitioner has been disclosed by informant during course of investigation at the later stage.
Report from the court below regarding stage of trial has been received wherein it is mentioned that charge has been framed on 29.10.2018. Case is pending of evidence. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.827 of 2019(3) dt.06-02-2019 2/2 prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned F.T.C. Vth, Madhepura in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 10/2004, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.
(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T