Patna High CourtCR. REV./685/2015dismissed

Jeebachh Sada And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-03Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 685 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null DistrictDARBHANGA ========================================================

1. Jeebachh Sada Son of Late Dhodhai Sada.

2. Kamlesh Sada Son of Lochan Sada.

3. Dhandeo Sada Son of Chalitra Sada.

4. Madhuri Sada Son of Ramdhanik Sada.

5. Madhu Sada Son of Late Dhodhari Sada.

6. Kaikun @ Bauku Sada Son of Nathuni Sada.

7. Ramlal Sada Son of Lakhan Sada.

8. Sadhu Sada Son of Late Dhodhari Sada.

9. Ram Udgar Sada Son of Late Ram Lakhan Sada.

10. Lal Babu Sada Son of Jugat Sada.

11. Jeebachh Sada Son of Nanhku Sada.

12. Salwar Sada Son of Lakhan Sada.

13. Bhatu Sada Son of Ramjee Sada.

14. Ajay Sada Son of Guduri Sada All residents of Village : Kataiya Mushahari, Dakshini Pokhram, Police Station : Biraul, District : Darbhanga (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Chandrabhas Chaudhary Son of Late Ram Kedar Chaudhary

3. Veena Devi Wife of Chandrabhas Chaudhary

4. Avinash Chaudhary Son of Late Mahesh Chaudhary

5. Sanjay Chaudhary Son of Late Mahesh Chaudhary All residents of Village - Pokhram, Police Station - Biraul, District - Darbhanga, Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramashankar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. APP.

======================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-02-2016 The Petitioners seek revision of the order dated 17.06.2014 passed by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Biraul, Darbhanga in Case No. 309 of 2012, by which he has passed orders under Section 145 CrPC without hearing the Petitioners. In view of the fact that it was the Petitioners who deliberately did not appear before the Court concerned, I see no reason for interference with the impugned order. The application stands dismissed.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T