Dilip Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61237 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2025 Thana- DHAMOUL District- Nawada ====================================================== Dilip Manjhi S/O Rajo Manjhi R/O Vill- Belkhunda, Tola- Bhojpur, P.SDhamoul, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhamaul P.S. Case No. 91 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 117(2), 109 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that all the accused persons are his neighbours who brutally assaulted him causing cut injury on his head and other injuries across his body. During the assault, Dilip Manjhi struck informant's son, Rambali Manjhi, with a rod with the intent to kill, causing a cut below his eye, and Brahma Devi hit his daughter-in-law, Geeta Devi, with a stick, injuring both of her hands.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61237 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to previous enmity. The petitioner is agnates of the informant. From perusal of F.I.R., it is clear that general and vague allegations are levelled against the petitioner due to previous enmity between them. His name has come only on the basis of previous enmity. There is no independent witness of the alleged occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that from perusal of F.I.R., there is specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the informant due to which he sustained injury below his eye. Injury report of injured has been annexed as Annexure-2 which suggest that one lacerated would on left cheek and one lacerated wound on right leg have been found. The nature of the injury has been opined as simple as per the injury report. Lastly he submits that other co-accused persons have been granted bail from the Court below.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61237 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 3/3 (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, V, Nawada, in connection with Dhamaul P.S. Case No. 91 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., further condition is that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T